Token cost math for LLM API calls: verified per-1M-token rates for 69 models, 17 providers.
Someone asks what the AI feature will cost at scale, and the honest answer around most teams is a shrug. Rates moved twice since anyone last checked, and the model itself will happily quote prices from its training data. This MCP server keeps current per-million-token rates for 69 models where your assistant can reach them, and does the arithmetic itself.
$ You: price Claude Opus 4.8 on a 25k-token prompt with a 1k answer, run 5,000 times
llm-cost › estimate_cost
Cost estimate: Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic)
Rates: input $5/1M, output $25/1M, cached input $0.5/1M
Per call (25,000 in + 1,000 out tokens):
input: $0.1250
output: $0.0250
per call total: $0.1500
Across 5,000 calls: $750.00
Ways to pay less for the same 5,000 calls:
with cached input: $187.50
via batch API: $375.00
Nothing here is rounded or guessed. The rate is verified, date-stamped, and the server multiplied.
$ You: compare that call on Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Terra and Gemini 3.1 Pro
llm-cost › compare_models_cost
25,000 in + 1,000 out, cheapest first:
1. Claude Sonnet 5 $0.0600 /call $300.00 /5k
2. Gemini 3.1 Pro $0.0620 /call $310.00 /5k
3. GPT-5.6 Terra $0.0775 /call $387.50 /5k
4. Claude Opus 4.8 $0.1500 /call $750.00 /5k
Ranking uses each model's live feed entry, not remembered prices.
| An assistant on its own | An assistant with llm-cost |
|---|---|
| quotes output rates from training data, often a generation stale | reads the current rate, dated |
| flattens the estimate to "a few cents" | $0.1500 per call, $750.00 across 5,000 |
| never mentions batch or caching discounts | $375.00 batch, $187.50 cached, only where the model really offers them |
| confidently wrong, no way to tell | every figure traces to a feed entry with a verification date |
The same numbers answer in a browser through the LLM calculator, and the LLM category hub ranks every tracked model by rating and price.
flowchart LR
V["provider pricing pages<br/>17 providers"] --> CE["verification<br/>date-stamped checks"]
CE --> F["model prices feed<br/>69 models, USD per 1M tokens"]
F -->|"6h cache, serve stale on failure"| MCP["llm-cost server<br/>local arithmetic"]
MCP --> A["your agent"]
The server never calls a provider API. It reads one public feed, llms-model-prices.json, and computes locally. Nothing to rate-limit, no key to leak, and a network hiccup serves the last good copy instead of an error. How each price gets checked is written up in the methodology, and the catalog behind it ships as an open dataset under CC BY 4.0.
Four do the math. Two help you find the exact model id the math wants.
| Tool | Answers | Params |
|---|---|---|
estimate_cost | one call, or N identical calls, in dollars | model, input_tokens, output_tokens, calls? |
compare_models_cost | the same call priced across 2 to 6 models | models[], input_tokens, output_tokens |
monthly_budget | daily, monthly, yearly spend for a workload | model, daily_calls, avg_input_tokens, avg_output_tokens |
cheapest_models | lowest-cost models, optional context floor | min_context?, limit? |
list_models | every model with rates, context and tier | provider? |
list_providers | providers with model counts and cheapest pick | none |
claude-opus-4-8, Opus 4.8 and anthropic/opus resolve to the same model. When the resolver is unsure, it returns candidates instead of guessing.cheapest_models ranks by a blended rate weighting input to output 3 to 1, because real workloads read far more than they write. Confirm the winner with estimate_cost on your actual split.| Prompt | Args | Runs |
|---|---|---|
estimate_my_workflow | workflow, model? | token estimates plus per-run and monthly cost for a described workflow |
pick_cheapest_model | task | cheapest model that still meets the requirement, top candidates priced |
forecast_ai_budget | model, usage | monthly and yearly bill projected from expected volume |
{
"mcpServers": {
"llm-cost": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@comparedge/llm-cost-mcp@latest"]
}
}
}
Claude Desktop keeps this file at ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json. Cursor: Settings, then MCP. VS Code with Copilot reads .vscode/mcp.json. Restart the client; six tools appear. No API key, no account. Per-client walkthroughs live in the setup guide.
Built by ComparEdge, where software prices are checked against vendor pages before anyone quotes them. Two siblings share the data: the full catalog server and a price-change watcher, both on ComparEdge MCP.
MIT licensed. JSON-RPC 2.0 over stdio, standard Model Context Protocol.
Source-derived launch command. Check the maintainer’s required arguments and credentials before running:
npx -y @comparedge/llm-cost-mcpMerge this template into ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json. Keep existing servers. Add any arguments, credentials, and permissions required by the maintainer; this template has not been install-tested.
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-github-imkemit-ops-comparedge-llm-cost": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@comparedge/llm-cost-mcp"
]
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop completely for changes to take effect. Confirm the server appears connected in the client’s tool list, then try a read-only example from its documentation.
Claude Desktop setup reference@comparedge/llm-cost-mcpnpmComparEdge LLM Cost works with any MCP-compatible client. Copy the config snippet from the Configuration section above and add it to the file shown for your client, then restart the application.
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonRestart Claude Desktop completely for changes to take effect.~/.cursor/mcp.jsonRestart Cursor for changes to take effect..vscode/mcp.jsonReload VS Code window for changes to take effect.~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.jsonRestart Windsurf for changes to take effect..mcp.jsonSave at the project root, then start Claude Code in that project and review the MCP server approval prompt. Keep real credentials out of shared files.