Manifest-driven MCP server scaffolder and runtime hub for tool integrations.
The test count is verifiable below (
python -m pytest tests/→ 348 passed, 8 skipped) and enforced in CI byscripts/check_readme_counts.py, which fails the build if this README's counts drift from the live suite.
From PyPI (registry users):
pip install jaimenbell-mcp-factory
mcp-factory-hub --serve
# equivalent: python -m mcp_factory --serve
From a git checkout (contributors): see the python hub_server.py ... examples throughout this README — hub_server.py at the repo root is a backward-compat wrapper around the same mcp_factory.cli module the console script runs, so behavior is identical either way.
The manifest-driven engine behind the MCP Integration Sprint. Write one mcp.yaml for a bot repo and the factory generates the server stub and the ~/.claude.json entry; run the hub and it serves every bot's tools through a single MCP endpoint.
The SDK wrapper is the easy part. What makes an MCP server safe to put in front of a real internal tool — scoped auth/env, fail-soft error handling, validated manifests, a collision-safe registry, and a real test suite — is the engineering this engine is built around. That same production layer is hand-built per engagement; the factory scaffolds it, it doesn't fake it.
This repo is public so you can verify the discipline instead of taking my word for it. Every claim below maps to a file you can open:
| Claim | Where it lives | What to look for |
|---|---|---|
| Validated, env-scoped manifests | mcp_factory/manifest.py | strict from_dict validation (raises on missing/invalid fields); the env_required / env model that scopes which secrets a server may see |
| Fail-soft subprocess proxying | mcp_factory/runtime/subprocess_adapter.py | typed SubprocessError, lazy start, JSON-RPC error surfacing, timeout/OSError-guarded teardown + atexit cleanup — a dead bot returns a clean error, it doesn't crash the hub |
| Collision-safe, manifest-driven registry | mcp_factory/runtime/registry.py · registry.json | CollisionError on duplicate <bot>.<tool> names; the registry is built from manifests, not hand-maintained |
| Tested on a clean checkout | tests/ | 348 passed, 8 skipped, 0 failed (Python 3.12); the 8 skips are real integration tests or lint checks that no-op when the thing they need is absent |
Honesty rails:
348is the real, reproducible count on a clean checkout — the same number the public CI run produces and gates on. mcp-factory generates the scaffold and runs the hub — it does not "generate the production server" or carry any client/CI claims. The hardened production layer (per-tool auth boundaries, the full failure set, two-axis version-pinning) is built per engagement on top of this engine. That applies to both Python scaffold styles below — see "Two Python styles" for exactly what the fastmcp variant does and doesn't add on top of that baseline.
# Reference an existing MCP server (no code generated — just the config entry)
python hub_server.py --manifest examples/fleet_health.yaml
# Scaffold a new MCP server from scratch
python hub_server.py --manifest my_bot/mcp.yaml --output-dir my_bot/
# Dry run — preview without writing
python hub_server.py --manifest my_bot/mcp.yaml --dry-run
# Self-verify: compare factory output to live ~/.claude.json entry
python hub_server.py --manifest examples/fleet_health.yaml --verify ~/.claude.json
Output always goes to ~/.claude.json.factory-test by default — never to the live ~/.claude.json. Copy entries manually after review.
# Dry-run diff: show what would change in ~/.claude.json
python hub_server.py --scan C:\path\to\projects
# Apply: write ~/.claude.json after backing it up
python hub_server.py --scan C:\path\to\projects --apply
# Force-update entries already registered
python hub_server.py --scan C:\path\to\projects --apply --force
--scan discovers all projects/*/mcp.yaml files, validates each, and diffs them against the current ~/.claude.json. Default root is C:\path\to\projects. With --apply, a timestamped backup is created at ~/.claude.json.scan-backup-<timestamp> before writing.
Skip logic: manifests whose name already exists in ~/.claude.json are skipped unless --force is passed. This prevents accidentally overwriting manually-crafted entries.
# Run the hub as a live MCP server (stdio transport)
python hub_server.py --serve
# Serve with multiple scan roots (repeatable)
python hub_server.py --serve \
--scan-root C:\path\to\projects \
--scan-root C:\path\to\Claude
# Register+serve in one step (scan --apply then start hub)
python hub_server.py --register \
--scan-root C:\path\to\projects \
--scan-root C:\path\to\Claude
The hub scans all mcp.yaml manifests under each --scan-root at startup, then exposes every bot's tools under the <bot>.<tool> namespace (e.g., fleet-health.fleet_status, my-bot.run_scan). Tools are proxied to per-bot subprocess MCP servers with lazy startup.
Hub meta-tool: _hub.list_bots returns the registered bots and their subprocess status.
Hub is pre-registered in ~/.claude.json as mcp-factory-hub (see scripts/register_hub.py).
Factory generates Node.js stubs when runtime.type: node is set in mcp.yaml:
runtime:
type: node
command: "node"
output: "path/to/server.js"
Generated stubs use @modelcontextprotocol/sdk with stdio transport and zod for argument validation. See examples/node_example.yaml for a working demo.
For runtime.type: python, the factory can scaffold either of two styles from the exact same manifest:
runtime:
type: python
command: "python"
style: raw # default — official `mcp` SDK, hand-rolled list_tools/call_tool
# style: fastmcp # FastMCP v3 (PrefectHQ/fastmcp), decorator-based tool registration
Both styles read the same tools: / env_required: fields and produce a server that speaks the same stdio JSON-RPC wire protocol — the runtime hub's SubprocessAdapter proxies either one without any adapter changes (see tests/test_fastmcp_template.py::TestFastmcpServeSmoke for a live generate-and-call test).
style: raw (python_server.py.j2) | style: fastmcp (python_fastmcp.j2) | |
|---|---|---|
| SDK | official mcp package, mcp.server.Server | fastmcp (pinned exact fastmcp==3.4.2 — 4.0.0b1 is a beta that breaks sampling/roots, do not float) |
| Tool registration | manual @server.list_tools() / @server.call_tool() dispatch | one @mcp.tool(...)-decorated function per tool |
| Arg schema | hand-built JSON Schema dict per arg | Annotated[type, Field(description=...)] on real Python parameters — FastMCP derives the JSON Schema, including required/optional, from the signature |
| Tool body | # TODO: implement stub | same stub, wrapped in try/except Exception — a runtime error in a filled-in implementation returns a structured {"status": "error", ...} instead of crashing the process |
env_required | not enforced at scaffold level | rendered into a _check_required_env() startup check that warns to stderr if a declared var is missing — a presence check, not credential validation |
Gaps, stated honestly: neither style implements per-tool authorization, rate limiting, or the "full failure set" the hub-level subprocess_adapter.py gives you for free (typed errors, lazy start, atexit cleanup) — that's still a per-engagement build on top of either scaffold. The fastmcp template's fail-soft wrapper and env-presence check are new, real code (read mcp_factory/templates/python_fastmcp.j2), not a marketing claim about auth — they were added because FastMCP's decorator model made them cheap to include cleanly; they have not (yet) been backported to the raw template, which is why the two styles differ slightly in what ships out of the box. If your engagement needs FastMCP-specific features beyond this (resources, prompts, HTTP/SSE transport, middleware-based auth), the generated file is a normal FastMCP app — extend it directly.
See examples/fastmcp_example.yaml for a working demo manifest.
name: my-bot # REQUIRED — unique MCP server name (key in claude.json)
description: > # REQUIRED — shown in Claude's tool descriptions
What this bot does and when to use it.
runtime: # REQUIRED
type: python # python | node | binary
command: "C:\\Python314\\python.exe" # full path to interpreter
script: "path/to/server.py" # existing server (skips scaffold generation)
output: "path/to/out.py" # where to write generated scaffold (omit = auto)
style: raw # python only: raw (default) | fastmcp — see "Two Python styles"
tools: # REQUIRED — list of MCP tools to expose
- name: tool_name # REQUIRED — programmatic identifier
title: "Tool Name" # Optional — human display name (see below)
description: > # REQUIRED — used by Claude for routing
What this tool does.
annotations: # Optional — the four MCP behaviour hints
readOnlyHint: true # tool does not modify anything
destructiveHint: false # tool does not perform destructive updates
idempotentHint: true # repeat calls have no additional effect
openWorldHint: false # tool does not touch an open external world
args: # Optional list of arguments
- name: arg_name # REQUIRED
type: string # string | number | boolean | object | array
required: true # default: true
description: "..." # shown in Claude's tool schema
env_required: # env var names that must be set at runtime
- MY_API_KEY
env: # static env vars injected into claude.json entry
MY_API_KEY: "" # leave value empty — fill in ~/.claude.json manually
tags: [trading, health] # for documentation / future routing
priority: high # high | medium | low
runtime.script + existing file → factory references it, skips scaffoldruntime.script + missing file → validation error (use runtime.output for new scaffolds)runtime.output → explicit path for generated stub (absolute recommended)script nor output → error at config-write steptitle and annotationsBoth are optional and both are worth declaring.
title is the human display name, which lets name stay a programmatic
identifier. Display precedence is title → annotations.title → name; the
factory exposes only the top-level title so one manifest cannot declare two
competing display names.
annotations matters more than it looks. The four hints have pessimistic
defaults — destructiveHint and openWorldHint both default to true,
readOnlyHint to false — so a tool that declares nothing is treated by a
careful client as the most dangerous thing it could be. Declaring
readOnlyHint: true on a read-only tool is how you opt out of that. Only the
four hint names above are accepted, each must be a real boolean, and an unknown
key is a hard error rather than a silent drop (the typo readonlyHint would
otherwise leave the tool effectively unannotated on the wire).
Annotations are hints, not a security boundary — the spec is explicit that a client should never make tool-use decisions based on annotations from an untrusted server. They inform a client's UX; they do not enforce anything.
Both fields are emitted by the two Python templates. The Node template does not
render them yet — the repo vendors no node_modules, so an altered call shape
could not be executed in test, and shipping unverified generated code is worse
than shipping the current shape. Declaring them in a node manifest is still
valid and forward-compatible.
Manifest validation is a security gate: it fails closed on anything that could inject code into a generated server. It says nothing about whether the resulting tools are any good. A manifest can be perfectly valid and still produce a server that makes an agent measurably worse.
Every run of factory mode therefore also runs a tool-design lint (Step 2), covering 15 rules across three scopes:
| Scope | Checks |
|---|---|
| manifest | tool-count budget, names colliding once case/separators are ignored, bare generic names that collide across servers |
| tool | empty / thin / filler descriptions, descriptions that only restate the name, non-snake_case and over-long names, missing annotations, unbounded listing tools, annotations that contradict the name |
| arg | undescribed parameters, unqualified parameter names, structured (object/array) parameters with no description and therefore no schema shape |
It is advisory by default — findings print, generation proceeds, exit 0.
--lint-strict makes error-severity findings fatal: it reports them, writes no
scaffold, and exits 3.
mcp-factory-hub --manifest examples/fastmcp_example.yaml --lint-strict
Three deliberate properties:
INDETERMINATE, not a clean bill, when it has no discriminating
power — a manifest whose runtime.script exists (the factory references that
hand-written file rather than generating one, so the tool list may not match
the real server), or a runtime with no template. --lint-strict never blocks
on an indeterminate result: the absence of a verdict must not be converted
into one.examples/ are themselves held to the lint by tests/test_examples_lint_clean.py.mcp.yaml at your bot repo root (or in examples/)python hub_server.py --manifest path/to/mcp.yaml
~/.claude.json.factory-test — confirm the entry looks correct~/.claude.json under mcpServersIf the bot has no existing server, the factory generates a stub at generated/<name>_server.py. Fill in the # TODO: implement sections and set runtime.script to the stub path for future runs.
hub_server.py --serve
└── mcp_factory/runtime/
├── hub.py async MCP server (lists + routes all tools)
├── registry.py maps <bot>.<tool> → manifest + adapter
└── subprocess_adapter.py spawns per-bot MCP server, proxies JSON-RPC
Subprocess lifecycle:
_hub.list_bots() reports status: idle (not yet started) or runningatexit on hub exit; stop() kills if needed after 5 sTool naming: <bot-name>.<tool-name> — hyphens preserved, dots as separator.
Example: fleet-health.fleet_status, my-bot.get_alerts.
Standalone CLI harness for research workflows, independent of hub_server.py.
# Discover and list all SKILL.md workflows
python -m mcp_factory.workflow_runner --list
# Run a specific workflow
python -m mcp_factory.workflow_runner --run my-skill
# Validate all discovered SKILL.md files
python -m mcp_factory.workflow_runner --validate
# Write/update registry.json from discovered skills
python -m mcp_factory.workflow_runner --write-registry
# Check for drift between discovered skills and registry.json
python -m mcp_factory.workflow_runner --check
# Control cache behavior
python -m mcp_factory.workflow_runner --run my-skill --cache-policy force-refresh
python -m mcp_factory.workflow_runner --run my-skill --cache-policy read-only
workflow_runner.py scans ~/research by default (override with --scan-root) for SKILL.md files containing YAML frontmatter. Each SKILL.md defines a named workflow with metadata:
---
name: my-skill
description: What this workflow does
output_path_template: "~/vault/output/{date}/{name}.md"
---
Prompt body passed to claude -p subprocess...
git ls-files to enumerate tracked SKILL.md files under each scan rootname, description)auto (default) skips re-run if output unchanged, force-refresh always re-runs, read-only never writesclaude -p <prompt> as a subprocess, streams outputoutput_path_template, writes result to vault--write-registry persists discovered skills to registry.json; --check detects drift between filesystem and registry without writingmcp-factory/
├── hub_server.py # CLI entry point (factory / scan / serve)
├── mcp_factory/
│ ├── manifest.py # Manifest dataclass + YAML loader + validation
│ ├── generator.py # Python MCP server stub scaffolder
│ ├── config.py # claude.json entry builder + comparator
│ ├── scan.py # --scan mode: manifest discovery + diff/apply
│ ├── workflow_runner.py # Day 4: standalone CLI harness for SKILL.md workflows
│ ├── templates/ # packaged as data so `pip install` ships them too
│ │ ├── python_server.py.j2 # Jinja2 template — raw mcp SDK stubs (style: raw, default)
│ │ ├── python_fastmcp.j2 # Jinja2 template — FastMCP v2 stubs (style: fastmcp)
│ │ └── node_server.js.j2 # Jinja2 template for generated Node.js stubs
│ └── runtime/
│ ├── subprocess_adapter.py # subprocess MCP client (JSON-RPC proxy)
│ ├── registry.py # tool registry with collision detection
│ └── hub.py # async hub MCP server
├── tests/
│ ├── fixtures/
│ │ ├── fleet_health.yaml # Day 1 self-verification fixture
│ │ ├── minimal.yaml # Minimal valid manifest
│ │ └── mock_mcp_server.py # Stdlib-only mock MCP server for adapter tests
│ ├── test_manifest.py
│ ├── test_generator.py
│ ├── test_subprocess_adapter.py
│ ├── test_registry.py
│ ├── test_scan.py
│ ├── test_hub_cli.py
│ ├── test_mcp_pkg.py
│ ├── test_node_template.py
│ ├── test_python_template.py
│ ├── test_fastmcp_template.py # style: fastmcp generation + import + serve-smoke tests
│ ├── test_register_flag.py
│ ├── test_registration.py
│ ├── test_smoke_hub.py
│ ├── test_watcher.py
│ ├── test_workflow_runner.py # Day 4: workflow_runner unit + integration tests
│ └── test_integration_fleet_health.py # live integration tests (skipped if server absent)
├── examples/
│ ├── fleet_health.yaml # Example manifest referencing an existing server
│ ├── node_example.yaml # Example manifest for the node template
│ └── fastmcp_example.yaml # Example manifest for the fastmcp template
└── pyproject.toml
The examples/fleet_health.yaml manifest references an example server. Running:
python hub_server.py --manifest examples/fleet_health.yaml --verify ~/.claude.json
confirms the factory produces a matching ~/.claude.json entry.
python -m pytest tests/ -v
On a clean checkout (Python 3.12), with pip install -e .[dev]: 348 passed, 8 skipped, 0 failed — the same numbers the public CI run produces and gates on.
The 8 skipped tests skip automatically when the resource or condition they need is absent:
test_integration_fleet_health.py (5 tests) requires a fleet-health server.py on disk (FLEET_HEALTH_SERVER_PATH).test_node_template.py (1 test) requires node and @modelcontextprotocol/sdk (node_modules/) to be present.test_examples_lint_clean.py (2 tests) skips examples/fleet_health.yaml, which references an existing hand-written server — the tool-design lint correctly reports INDETERMINATE there rather than judging code it cannot see, and a skip is the honest way to record that.test_smoke_hub.py (4 tests) no longer needs a live bot fleet to run for real: the hub's demo-manifest fallback (see below) gives it something to discover even against an empty scan root, so these run unconditionally on a clean checkout now.
(On the maintainer's fleet machine, where the fleet-health server and live bots exist, the remaining skipped integration tests run for real and the passed count is higher — but this README claims only what a clean checkout and public CI reproduce.)
The fastmcp-style template tests (test_fastmcp_template.py) are not in this skip list — fastmcp is installed as a [dev] extra, so they run for real on a standard dev setup.
Maintained by Jaimen Bell. For production MCP integrations, custom servers, or agent-reliability work, see jaimenbell.dev.
Building your own MCP server? The MCP Starter Kit has templates, a build playbook, and packaging war-stories from shipping this one.
mcp-name: io.github.jaimenbell/mcp-factory
Source-derived launch command. Check the maintainer’s required arguments and credentials before running:
uvx jaimenbell-mcp-factoryMerge this template into ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json. Keep existing servers. Add any arguments, credentials, and permissions required by the maintainer; this template has not been install-tested.
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-github-jaimenbell-mcp-factory": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"jaimenbell-mcp-factory"
]
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop completely for changes to take effect. Confirm the server appears connected in the client’s tool list, then try a read-only example from its documentation.
Claude Desktop setup referencejaimenbell-mcp-factorypypiio.github.jaimenbell/mcp-factory works with any MCP-compatible client. Copy the config snippet from the Configuration section above and add it to the file shown for your client, then restart the application.
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonRestart Claude Desktop completely for changes to take effect.~/.cursor/mcp.jsonRestart Cursor for changes to take effect..vscode/mcp.jsonReload VS Code window for changes to take effect.~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.jsonRestart Windsurf for changes to take effect..mcp.jsonSave at the project root, then start Claude Code in that project and review the MCP server approval prompt. Keep real credentials out of shared files.